<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cuothe IT Criticism &#38; Curmudgeonery &#187; Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cuothe.pundit.ca/category/record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cuothe.pundit.ca</link>
	<description>Adam Cuothe&#039;s column cut&#039;s through IT industry analysis and PR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:28:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do Analysts Scream from Synthetic Feats?</title>
		<link>http://cuothe.pundit.ca/2006/09/22/do-analysts-scream-from-synthetic-feats/</link>
		<comments>http://cuothe.pundit.ca/2006/09/22/do-analysts-scream-from-synthetic-feats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Cuothe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Record]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cuothe.phydeau.org/2006/09/22/do-analysts-scream-from-synthetic-feats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Will it hurt?&#8221; They might ask. When it hurts enough, maybe someone will start digging an analyst firm graveyard site. ;-) A few analyst firms recently got gobbled up. Notably, Yankee Group bought Trendsmedia, which produces (among other things) research on broadband and wifi, err wimax emerging doodling. The other one I note is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Will it hurt?&#8221; They might ask. When it hurts enough, maybe someone will start digging an analyst firm graveyard site. ;-)</p>
<p>A few analyst firms recently got gobbled up. Notably, <a title="Yankee Group PR" href="http://www.yankeegroup.com/public/news_releases/news_release_detail.jsp?ID=PressReleases/news_Yankee_Group_and_Trendsmedia.htm">Yankee Group</a> bought Trendsmedia, which produces (among other things) research on broadband and wifi, err wimax emerging doodling. The other one I note is the Harte-Hanks hug of Aberdeen Group. The new group, HHAG, is being <a title="article about HH purchase of AG" href="http://www.dmnews.com/cms/dm-news/database-marketing/38323.html">reported</a> as a good method for the company to deliver leads to its clients. In the <a title="Harte-Hanks Press Release on Aberdeen Acquisition" href="http://www.harte-hanks.com/interior.aspx?categoryid=18&amp;NewsID=749">press release</a>, Gary Skidmore (HH VP) says of Aberdeen</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The results of Aberdeen&#8217;s intelligence – fact-based reports on current marketplace experiences and trends – are used to generate qualified leads by its clients, and we believe this intelligence will assist our clients significantly in their own marketing efforts.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So this is supposed to correspond well with HH&#8217;s Ci tech database, which it describes as</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Unlike general marketing database and list companies, we focus exclusively on profiling the largest opportunities and most important decision makers in the technology marketplace.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It does sound like quite the synthesis and though not connected, analysts, rumour has it, have departed. But then analysis tends to do that&#8211;break things apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cuothe.pundit.ca/2006/09/22/do-analysts-scream-from-synthetic-feats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
